Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
In Order of Disappearance (2014) poster
2014
global pct
89.9

Film · 2014 · Films · 2010s

In Order of Disappearance

Two parallel scores from 92 z-qualifying reviewers and 92 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

89.9%
Z · Global
92.9%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
74.3%
Raw · Global
81.0%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↑ critic-elevated · 16-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
89.9
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
92.9
Raw average · global
74.3
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
81.0

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 16-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — discriminating reviewers liked it more than the casual crowd.

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.540
DB1 raw-mean rating7.61 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.61 /10
90% CI-floor (z)+0.368
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)92 / 92

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

92 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.540. DB2 raw mean = 7.61.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = +0.368. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 89.9 / cohort 92.9. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376