RankquantRQ

Browse the complete films & TV index →

Live · 52,376 titles

Movies & TV

Every film and series with at least 3 z-qualifying reviewers, ranked on the mean per-reviewer z-score and dual-scored (z-normalized + raw average). 61.6% of titles now carry blended IMDb + Rotten Tomatoes signal.

52,376
Films & TV
11.0M
IMDb + RT reviewers
55.4M
Reviews ingested
2.06M
Z-qualified pool

Top of the rankings

Highest z-normalized percentile

Browse all 52,376 →
The Green Planet
100
TV Mini Series · 2022 · n=13
Danger UXB
100
TV Series · 1979 · n=10
Mr. Dynamite: The Rise of James Brown
100
Film · 2014 · n=7
Interrogation
100
Film · 1989 · n=5
Hazard
100
Film · 2024 · n=5
1992: Berlusconi Rising
100
TV Series · 2015 · n=5
Koose Munisamy Veerappan
100
TV Series · 2023 · n=5
Road
100
Film · 2014 · n=5
The Morecambe & Wise Show
100
TV Series · 1968 · n=4
My Uncle Napoleon
100
TV Series · 1976 · n=4
Thaniyavartanam
100
Film · 1987 · n=4
Life in the Freezer
100
TV Mini Series · 1993 · n=4

Where the methodology pays off

Biggest inflation gaps

Films where z-normalized and raw-average percentiles diverge most — discriminating reviewers vs. casual crowd.

Chiranjeeva
4.2↓92
2025 · z=4.2 raw=96.1
Landlord
9.4↓89
2026 · z=9.4 raw=98.8
Wedding Gift
9.7↓89
2022 · z=9.7 raw=98.9
Fuh se Fantasy
9.4↓88
2019 · z=9.4 raw=97.8
1997
8.5↓88
2021 · z=8.5 raw=96.2
Saat Kadam
8.5↓88
2021 · z=8.5 raw=96.1

Score distribution

0255075100

z-normalized · all 52,376 titles

Source coverage

Which sources are ingested today and which are roadmapped. No source and no reviewer carries a weight: every qualifying reviewer is normalized onto their own z-scale and then counted once, whichever source they came from.
IMDb (live)1.79M reviewers, 5.43M reviews ingested. 1.17M qualified for z-normalization (DB1, stddev>0); 1.37M qualified for raw-average track (DB2, review_count≥2).
Rotten Tomatoes (live)Blended in where a title matches — 61.6% of the catalog now carries blended IMDb + Rotten Tomatoes signal.
Catalog filterTitles with at least 3 z-normalizable reviewers — below that, a mean per-reviewer z-score is too thin a measurement to rank.
Metacritic (not ingested)Roadmapped. A pre-weighted professional aggregate: Metacritic applies its own editor-assigned weight to each publication before averaging.
Letterboxd (not ingested)Roadmapped. Cinephile audience; a cleaner crowd signal than IMDb.
Which sources are ingested today and which are roadmapped. No source and no reviewer carries a weight: every qualifying reviewer is normalized onto their own z-scale and then counted once, whichever source they came from.

How the cohort is defined

Those two fields are the whole cohort. A 2019 feature is re-ranked against other features released in the 2010s, not against Citizen Kane, and the exact cohort label (“Movies · 2010s”) is printed on every title page beside the in-cohort percentile so you can judge the comparison. Genre and budget are not cohort dimensions. The in-cohort percentile is the same mean z-score as the global one, simply re-ranked inside a smaller set — a re-ranking, not a second computation.

Frequently asked questions

Does Rankquant weight Rotten Tomatoes differently from Metacritic?+
No. Rankquant does not weight sources at all — every qualifying reviewer is normalized onto their own z-scale and then counted once, with no source multiplier anywhere in the pipeline. The Tomatometer has a different problem: it is a binary fresh/rotten verdict aggregated into a percentage, so it throws away the difference between a 60% review and a 95% review before anyone can use it. Per-reviewer z-normalization is what we do instead, and it keeps exactly the cardinal information a binary verdict destroys. Film and TV scores are built from IMDb reviewer-level ratings, blended with Rotten Tomatoes where available. Full argument at /blog/rotten-tomatoes-problem.
Will you cover streaming-exclusive series?+
Yes — IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes both cover streaming originals. Netflix, Apple TV+, HBO, Prime Video, Disney+ limited series get the same treatment as theatrical releases.
What about audience scores vs. critic scores?+
Neither is given more influence, because no reviewer is given more influence. Every qualifying reviewer is normalized onto their own z-scale and then counted once, exactly like every other reviewer — there is no credibility weight, no source weight and no professional-versus-crowd multiplier anywhere in the pipeline. What actually varies is how many reviewers stand behind a title, and that is what the AI-adjusted percentile discounts for. Film and TV scores are built from IMDb reviewer-level ratings, blended with Rotten Tomatoes where available.
What affiliate links do you show?+
One. Opening a title in /movies/catalog/ shows a Prime Video link — an Amazon search for the title and year, as an Amazon Associates link. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Individual film pages carry no streaming link at all; their only outbound link is to IMDb, which is untracked. Apple TV+, Hulu and physical media are not currently offered.

Status: movies + TV is live with 52,376 dual-scored titles. Browse the full catalog at /movies/catalog or read the Tomatometer critique for the methodology argument.