Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search

Live · 52,376 titles

Movies & TV

Every film and series with at least 3 z-qualifying reviewers, ranked on a 90% confidence-interval floor and dual-scored (z-normalized + raw average). 61.6% of titles now carry blended IMDb + Rotten Tomatoes signal.

52,376
Films & TV
11.0M
IMDb + RT reviewers
55.4M
Reviews ingested
2.06M
Z-qualified pool

Top of the rankings

Highest z-normalized percentile

Browse all 52,376 →
The Green Planet
100
TV Mini Series · 2022 · n=13
Danger UXB
100
TV Series · 1979 · n=10
Mr. Dynamite: The Rise of James Brown
100
Film · 2014 · n=7
Interrogation
100
Film · 1989 · n=5
Hazard
100
Film · 2024 · n=5
1992: Berlusconi Rising
100
TV Series · 2015 · n=5
Koose Munisamy Veerappan
100
TV Series · 2023 · n=5
Road
100
Film · 2014 · n=5
The Morecambe & Wise Show
100
TV Series · 1968 · n=4
My Uncle Napoleon
100
TV Series · 1976 · n=4
Thaniyavartanam
100
Film · 1987 · n=4
Life in the Freezer
100
TV Mini Series · 1993 · n=4

Where the methodology pays off

Biggest inflation gaps

Films where z-normalized and raw-average percentiles diverge most — discriminating reviewers vs. casual crowd.

Chiranjeeva
4.2↓92
2025 · z=4.2 raw=96.1
Landlord
9.4↓89
2026 · z=9.4 raw=98.8
Wedding Gift
9.7↓89
2022 · z=9.7 raw=98.9
Fuh se Fantasy
9.4↓88
2019 · z=9.4 raw=97.8
1997
8.5↓88
2021 · z=8.5 raw=96.2
Saat Kadam
8.5↓88
2021 · z=8.5 raw=96.1

Score distribution

0255075100

z-normalized · all 52,376 titles

Source coverage at launch

One source at launch (IMDb), uniform reviewer weighting. Metacritic, Rotten Tomatoes, and Letterboxd integration is on the roadmap.
IMDb (live)1.79M reviewers, 5.43M reviews ingested. 1.17M qualified for z-normalization (DB1, stddev>0); 1.37M qualified for raw-average track (DB2, review_count≥2).
Catalog filterTitles with at least 3 z-normalizable reviewers — the threshold below which CI-floor ranking becomes statistically unstable.
MetacriticWeight 8 (planned) — pre-weighted professional critic aggregate
LetterboxdWeight 6 (planned) — cinephile audience; cleaner crowd signal than IMDb
Rotten Tomatoes (critics)Weight 6 (planned) — binary fresh/rotten loses cardinal info; will be deliberately down-weighted
One source at launch (IMDb), uniform reviewer weighting. Metacritic, Rotten Tomatoes, and Letterboxd integration is on the roadmap.

Peer-set dimensions

A 2019 horror film with a normalized 4.8 is being compared against other 2010s-era horror films with similar budgets, not against Citizen Kane. Peer-set labels are shown on every review page so you can judge the comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Why is Rotten Tomatoes weighted lower than Metacritic?+
The Tomatometer is a binary (fresh/rotten) aggregated into a percentage of reviewers. It discards the difference between a 60% review and a 95% review. Metacritic preserves the cardinal score (0–100) with editor-assigned source weights. Same reviews → more information preserved on Metacritic. Full argument at /blog/rotten-tomatoes-problem.
Will you cover streaming-exclusive series?+
Yes — Metacritic, Letterboxd, and IMDb all cover streaming originals. Netflix, Apple TV+, HBO, Prime Video, Disney+ limited series get the same treatment as theatrical releases.
What about audience scores vs. critic scores?+
We use both. Letterboxd and IMDb provide the crowd signal; Metacritic and the Rotten Tomatoes critic aggregate provide the professional signal. The weighting gives more influence to professional sources (credibility per review) while still incorporating crowd volume.
What affiliate links will you show?+
Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, and physical media (Blu-ray / 4K UHD) via Amazon Associates. Hulu via Impact Radius. Routing logic is the same formula used for wines: lowest rental/purchase price combined with highest affiliate commission.

Status: movies + TV is live with 41,343 dual-scored titles across 690 catalog pages. Browse the full catalog at /movies/catalog or read the Tomatometer critique for the methodology argument.