Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Two Rabbits (2012) poster
2012
global pct
25.9

Film · 2012 · Films · 2010s

Two Rabbits

Two parallel scores from 10 z-qualifying reviewers and 10 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

25.9%
Z · Global
31.3%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
63.6%
Raw · Global
71.8%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 38-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
25.9
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
31.3
Raw average · global
63.6
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
71.8

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 38-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.307
DB1 raw-mean rating7.20 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.20 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.827
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)10 / 10

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

10 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.307. DB2 raw mean = 7.20.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.827. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 25.9 / cohort 31.3. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376