Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
John & Jane (2005) poster
2005
global pct
17.4

Film · 2005 · Films · 2000s

John & Jane

Two parallel scores from 94 z-qualifying reviewers and 103 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

17.4%
Z · Global
18.8%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2000s
92.4%
Raw · Global
95.8%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2000s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 75-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
17.4
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2000s
18.8
Raw average · global
92.4
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2000s
95.8

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 75-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 7,847 peers in Films · 2000s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.452
DB1 raw-mean rating8.51 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating8.55 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.622
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)94 / 103

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

94 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.452. DB2 raw mean = 8.55.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.622. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 17.4 / cohort 18.8. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376