Is Flesh for the Beast actually good?

Flesh for the Beast sits in the 16.8% percentile against all 52,376 ranked films, meaning it scores above 16.8% of them.

How does Flesh for the Beast compare to similar films?

Within Films · 2000s, Flesh for the Beast lands in the 18.2% percentile. The cohort comparison exists because a global rank flatters or punishes a film for its category rather than its quality.

How many reviewers is Flesh for the Beast's score based on?

35 calibrated reviewers stand behind Flesh for the Beast's score.

2003

global pct

16.8

Film · 2003 · Films · 2000s

Flesh for the Beast

Name: Flesh for the Beast
Genre: Fantasy, Horror
Released: 2003

Scored from 35 calibrated IMDb reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

16.8%

Global percentile

vs. all 52,376 ranked titles

18.2%

In-cohort percentile

Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles

13.6%

AI-adjusted percentile

35 calibrated reviewers

Summary

Flesh for the Beast is a 2003 fantasy and horror film.

The cohort it is ranked inside is 2000s films — 7,847 of them. A second review pool sits behind it as well: 37 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately. Only 35 of its IMDb reviewers are calibrated, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 35 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track.

Is Flesh for the Beast (2003) worth watching?

Cohort: Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
Calibrated reviewers: 35
Method: How percentiles are computed

Cohort: Films · 2000s

What else scores like Flesh for the Beast?