Is Balls of Fury actually good?

Balls of Fury sits in the 16.8% percentile against all 52,376 ranked films, meaning it scores above 16.8% of them.

How does Balls of Fury compare to similar films?

Within Films · 2000s, Balls of Fury lands in the 18.2% percentile. The cohort comparison exists because a global rank flatters or punishes a film for its category rather than its quality.

How many reviewers is Balls of Fury's score based on?

130 calibrated reviewers stand behind Balls of Fury's score.

2007

global pct

16.8

Film · 2007 · Films · 2000s

Balls of Fury

Name: Balls of Fury
Genre: Comedy, Crime, Sport
Released: 2007

Scored from 130 calibrated IMDb reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

16.8%

Global percentile

vs. all 52,376 ranked titles

18.2%

In-cohort percentile

Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles

5.3%

AI-adjusted percentile

130 calibrated reviewers

Summary

Disgraced former table tennis prodigy Randy Daytona is recruited by the FBI to infiltrate an underground ping pong tournament hosted by the eccentric crime lord Feng. Training under a blind master and his niece, Randy must rediscover his game to bring down Feng's weapons-trafficking operation.

Balls of Fury is a 2007 comedy, crime and sport film.

The calibrated figure is built from 130 of its IMDb reviewers. A broader pool of 134 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 10,715 of whom clear the calibration test. 7,846 other films from the 2000s form the cohort it is ranked inside.

Is Balls of Fury (2007) worth watching?

Cohort: Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
Calibrated reviewers: 130
Method: How percentiles are computed

Cohort: Films · 2000s

What else scores like Balls of Fury?