Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Do Not Disturb (2014) poster
2014
global pct
25.0

Film · 2014 · Films · 2010s

Do Not Disturb

Two parallel scores from 5 z-qualifying reviewers and 5 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

25.0%
Z · Global
30.2%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
52.6%
Raw · Global
61.5%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 28-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
25.0
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
30.2
Raw average · global
52.6
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
61.5

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 28-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.321
DB1 raw-mean rating6.80 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating6.80 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-1.056
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)5 / 5

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

5 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.321. DB2 raw mean = 6.80.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -1.056. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 25 / cohort 30.2. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376