Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Citrus (2018) poster
2018
global pct
29.9

TV Mini Series · 2018 · TV Mini Series · 2010s

Citrus

Two parallel scores from 23 z-qualifying reviewers and 30 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: TV Mini Series · 2010s (702 peers).

29.9%
Z · Global
18.4%
Z · Cohort
TV Mini Series · 2010s
81.6%
Raw · Global
73.9%
Raw · Cohort
TV Mini Series · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 52-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
29.9
Z-normalized · cohortTV Mini Series · 2010s
18.4
Raw average · global
81.6
Raw average · cohortTV Mini Series · 2010s
73.9

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 52-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 702 peers in TV Mini Series · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.248
DB1 raw-mean rating7.30 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.93 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.591
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)23 / 30

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

23 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.248. DB2 raw mean = 7.93.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.591. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 29.9 / cohort 18.4. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: TV Mini Series · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376