Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Chup (2022) poster
2022
global pct
58.1

Film · 2022 · Films · 2020s

Chup

Two parallel scores from 157 z-qualifying reviewers and 177 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2020s (7,930 peers).

58.1%
Z · Global
66.8%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2020s
77.1%
Raw · Global
81.2%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2020s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 19-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
58.1
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2020s
66.8
Raw average · global
77.1
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2020s
81.2

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 19-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 7,930 peers in Films · 2020s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.095
DB1 raw-mean rating7.56 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.73 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.037
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)157 / 177

Summary

A serial killer is targeting film critics in Mumbai, carving words onto their bodies in reference to their reviews. A police investigator teams up with a psychologist to track the murderer, while a quiet florist begins a tender romance with a young entertainment journalist. The case turns on the killer's obsession with a long-buried film and the wounds critics can inflict on artists.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

157 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.095. DB2 raw mean = 7.73.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.037. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 58.1 / cohort 66.8. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2020s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376