Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Are We OK? (2013) poster
2013
global pct
58.7

Film · 2013 · Films · 2010s

Are We OK?

Two parallel scores from 3 z-qualifying reviewers and 5 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

58.7%
Z · Global
65.6%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
90.3%
Raw · Global
94.4%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 32-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
58.7
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
65.6
Raw average · global
90.3
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
94.4

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 32-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.103
DB1 raw-mean rating7.33 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating8.40 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.847
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)3 / 5

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

3 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.103. DB2 raw mean = 8.40.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.847. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 58.7 / cohort 65.6. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376