RankquantRQ
Bodega Doña Felisa Doble 12 Ronda

Red · Sierras de Málaga · España

Bodega Doña Felisa Doble 12 Ronda

Scored from 164 calibrated Vivino reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the bottle is ranked. Cohort: Red · España (178 wines).

72.3%
Global percentile
vs. all 69,234 ranked wines
68.9%
In-cohort percentile
Red · España · 178 wines
75.3%
AI-adjusted percentile
164 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Find this wine: view on Vivino · compare prices on Wine-Searcher

What reviewers say

Tomado en Ronda, Tabanco los Arcos, capital de la subzona Serrania de Ronda de la DO Sierra de Malaga. Muy bueno este vino, a 4€ copa o 22€ servido en mesa. Muy buen precio.

From a top-rated Vivino review for this bottle.

Summary

Bodega Doña Felisa Doble 12 Ronda is a red from Sierras de Málaga, Spain.

The calibrated figure is built from 164 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 165 reviewers with two or more ratings feeds the raw-average track instead. 177 other reds from Spain form the cohort it is ranked inside.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this bottle against every other wine those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — four stars from someone who hands out fives means something very different from four stars from someone who rarely goes above three. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a star average.

Global percentile
Where Bodega Doña Felisa Doble 12 Ronda lands against every wine we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — wines of the same type from the same country. A Chilean red is judged against Chilean reds, not against Champagne. Ranked against Red · España (178 wines).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each wine keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 164.