Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
White Fang (2018) poster
2018
global pct
89.2

Film · 2018 · Films · 2010s

White Fang

Two parallel scores from 19 z-qualifying reviewers and 21 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

89.2%
Z · Global
92.3%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
72.2%
Raw · Global
79.3%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↑ critic-elevated · 17-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
89.2
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
92.3
Raw average · global
72.2
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
79.3

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 17-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — discriminating reviewers liked it more than the casual crowd.

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.525
DB1 raw-mean rating7.53 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.52 /10
90% CI-floor (z)+0.148
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)19 / 21

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

19 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.525. DB2 raw mean = 7.52.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = +0.148. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 89.2 / cohort 92.3. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376