RankquantRQ
Underworld: Evolution (2006) poster
2006
global pct
38.1

Film · 2006 · Films · 2000s

Underworld: Evolution

Scored from 375 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

38.1%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
42.2%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
20.7%
AI-adjusted percentile
375 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

Vampire warrior Selene and the hybrid Michael Corvin go on the run as they uncover the ancient origins of the war between vampires and Lycans. Pursued by the awakened Elder Marcus, they race to unravel a centuries-old secret tied to the first immortals and the bloodline that could end the conflict.

Released in 2006, Underworld: Evolution is an action, fantasy and thriller film.

The calibrated figure is built from 375 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 389 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. Its in-cohort standing is measured against the other 7,846 2000s films, not against the whole corpus. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 18,298 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Underworld: Evolution lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2000s (7,847 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 375.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376