Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Tune in for Love (2019) poster
2019
global pct
34.9

Film · 2019 · Films · 2010s

Tune in for Love

Two parallel scores from 49 z-qualifying reviewers and 51 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

34.9%
Z · Global
40.9%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
67.1%
Raw · Global
75.0%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 32-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
34.9
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
40.9
Raw average · global
67.1
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
75.0

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 32-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.180
DB1 raw-mean rating7.22 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.33 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.415
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)49 / 51

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

49 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.180. DB2 raw mean = 7.33.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.415. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 34.9 / cohort 40.9. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376