RankquantRQ
Mulk (2018) poster
2018
global pct
57.0

Film · 2018 · Films · 2010s

Mulk

Scored from 240 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

57.0%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
63.7%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
72.6%
AI-adjusted percentile
240 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

After a younger member of a Muslim joint family in Varanasi is implicated in a terrorist attack, the household is branded anti-national and the patriarch is dragged into court. A lawyer in the family takes up their defense, turning the trial into a broader reckoning with prejudice, citizenship, and what it means to belong.

Mulk (2018) is a film IMDb files under the drama genre.

Its in-cohort standing is measured against the other 13,058 2010s films, not against the whole corpus. The calibrated figure is built from 240 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 296 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 5 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Mulk lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 240.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376