RankquantRQ
Maniac (2012) poster
2012
global pct
48.0

Film · 2012 · Films · 2010s

Maniac

Scored from 179 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

48.0%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
54.8%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
43.8%
AI-adjusted percentile
179 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A reclusive, mentally disturbed owner of a mannequin store stalks and murders young women in Los Angeles, scalping his victims to adorn his mannequins. Told almost entirely from the killer's first-person point of view, the film follows his fragile psyche as he becomes fixated on a French artist whose work features mannequins. A remake of the 1980 cult slasher.

Released in 2012, Maniac is a crime, horror and thriller film.

The calibrated figure is built from 179 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 181 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. 13,058 other films from the 2010s form the cohort it is ranked inside. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 685 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Maniac lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 179.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376