RankquantRQ
Lions for Lambs (2007) poster
2007
global pct
27.7

Film · 2007 · Films · 2000s

Lions for Lambs

Scored from 220 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

27.7%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
30.3%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
10.3%
AI-adjusted percentile
220 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

Three interwoven storylines unfold in real time: a charismatic senator pitches a new Afghanistan strategy to a veteran journalist, a California professor confronts a talented but disengaged student about civic responsibility, and two of the professor's former students serve as soldiers caught in a perilous mission on an Afghan mountainside.

Released in 2007, Lions for Lambs is a crime, drama and mystery film.

Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 6,146 of whom clear the calibration test. 7,846 other films from the 2000s form the cohort it is ranked inside. The calibrated figure is built from 220 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 232 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Lions for Lambs lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2000s (7,847 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 220.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376