Is Lions for Lambs actually good?

Lions for Lambs sits in the 27.7% percentile against all 52,376 ranked films, meaning it scores above 27.7% of them.

How does Lions for Lambs compare to similar films?

Within Films · 2000s, Lions for Lambs lands in the 30.3% percentile. The cohort comparison exists because a global rank flatters or punishes a film for its category rather than its quality.

How many reviewers is Lions for Lambs's score based on?

220 calibrated reviewers stand behind Lions for Lambs's score.

2007

global pct

27.7

Film · 2007 · Films · 2000s

Lions for Lambs

Name: Lions for Lambs
Genre: Crime, Drama, Mystery
Released: 2007

Scored from 220 calibrated IMDb reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

27.7%

Global percentile

vs. all 52,376 ranked titles

30.3%

In-cohort percentile

Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles

10.3%

AI-adjusted percentile

220 calibrated reviewers

Summary

Three interwoven storylines unfold in real time: a charismatic senator pitches a new Afghanistan strategy to a veteran journalist, a California professor confronts a talented but disengaged student about civic responsibility, and two of the professor's former students serve as soldiers caught in a perilous mission on an Afghan mountainside.

Released in 2007, Lions for Lambs is a crime, drama and mystery film.

Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 6,146 of whom clear the calibration test. 7,846 other films from the 2000s form the cohort it is ranked inside. The calibrated figure is built from 220 of its IMDb reviewers. A broader pool of 232 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead.

Is Lions for Lambs (2007) worth watching?

Cohort: Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
Calibrated reviewers: 220
Method: How percentiles are computed

Cohort: Films · 2000s

What else scores like Lions for Lambs?