RankquantRQ
Jennifer 8 (1992) poster
1992
global pct
40.3

Film · 1992 · Films · 1990s

Jennifer 8

Scored from 70 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 1990s (4,082 peers).

40.3%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
37.6%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 1990s · 4,082 titles
31.1%
AI-adjusted percentile
70 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A detective investigating the murders of blind women becomes obsessed with a mysterious woman who may be connected to the killings. As he gets closer to the truth, his obsession puts him in danger.

Jennifer 8 (1992) is a film IMDb files under the crime, drama and mystery genres. It runs 1h 51m and carries an R certificate. It was made in the United States.

Only 70 of its IMDb reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 72 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track. 4,081 other films from the 1990s form the cohort it is ranked inside. A second review pool sits behind it as well: 130 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Jennifer 8 lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 1990s (4,082 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 70.

Cohort: Films · 1990s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376