RankquantRQ
In the Mouth of Madness (1994) poster
1994
global pct
70.9

Film · 1994 · Films · 1990s

In the Mouth of Madness

Scored from 295 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 1990s (4,082 peers).

70.9%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
70.6%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 1990s · 4,082 titles
91.8%
AI-adjusted percentile
295 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

Insurance investigator John Trent is hired to find Sutter Cane, a wildly popular horror novelist who has vanished along with the manuscript of his latest book. Trent's search leads him to a small New England town that may not exist outside Cane's fiction, where the line between reality and the author's nightmares begins to dissolve.

In the Mouth of Madness (1994) is a film IMDb files under the drama, fantasy and horror genres.

Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 1,271 of whom clear the calibration test. The calibrated figure is built from 295 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 305 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. The cohort it is ranked inside is 1990s films — 4,082 of them.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where In the Mouth of Madness lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 1990s (4,082 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 295.

Cohort: Films · 1990s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376