RankquantRQ
Hangman (2017) poster
2017
global pct
11.3

Film · 2017 · Films · 2010s

Hangman

Scored from 229 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

11.3%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
14.4%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
1.7%
AI-adjusted percentile
229 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A homicide detective nearing retirement and a criminal profiler partner with a journalist to hunt a serial killer who is staging his murders as a real-life game of Hangman, leaving clues that point to the investigators themselves. As the body count rises, the team races to decode the killer's pattern before he completes his deadly puzzle.

Hangman (2017) is a film IMDb files under the crime, drama and horror genres.

Its in-cohort standing is measured against the other 13,058 2010s films, not against the whole corpus. The calibrated figure is built from 229 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 238 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 69 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Hangman lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 229.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376