Is Hands of Stone actually good?

Hands of Stone sits in the 62.5% percentile against all 52,376 ranked films, meaning it scores above 62.5% of them.

How does Hands of Stone compare to similar films?

Within Films · 2010s, Hands of Stone lands in the 69.3% percentile. The cohort comparison exists because a global rank flatters or punishes a film for its category rather than its quality.

How many reviewers is Hands of Stone's score based on?

52 calibrated reviewers stand behind Hands of Stone's score.

2016

global pct

62.5

Film · 2016 · Films · 2010s

Hands of Stone

Name: Hands of Stone
Genre: Biography, Drama, Sport
Released: 2016

Scored from 52 calibrated IMDb reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

62.5%

Global percentile

vs. all 52,376 ranked titles

69.3%

In-cohort percentile

Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles

74.0%

AI-adjusted percentile

52 calibrated reviewers

Summary

Released in 2016, Hands of Stone is a biography, drama and sport film.

13,058 other films from the 2010s form the cohort it is ranked inside. A second review pool sits behind it as well: 118 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately. Only 52 of its IMDb reviewers are calibrated, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 52 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track.

Is Hands of Stone (2016) worth watching?

Cohort: Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
Calibrated reviewers: 52
Method: How percentiles are computed

Cohort: Films · 2010s

What else scores like Hands of Stone?