Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
G.B.F. (2013) poster
2013
global pct
33.1

Film · 2013 · Films · 2010s

G.B.F.

Two parallel scores from 24 z-qualifying reviewers and 25 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

33.1%
Z · Global
38.9%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
49.4%
Raw · Global
58.5%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 16-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
33.1
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
38.9
Raw average · global
49.4
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
58.5

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 16-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.204
DB1 raw-mean rating6.63 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating6.68 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.540
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)24 / 25

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

24 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.204. DB2 raw mean = 6.68.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.540. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 33.1 / cohort 38.9. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376