RankquantRQ
Failure to Launch (2006) poster
2006
global pct
13.7

Film · 2006 · Films · 2000s

Failure to Launch

Scored from 206 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

13.7%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
14.8%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
2.7%
AI-adjusted percentile
206 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

Tripp is a thirtysomething who still lives with his parents, so they secretly hire Paula, a professional interventionist who specializes in coaxing grown men out of the nest by making them fall for her. The plan works until Tripp's friends uncover the arrangement and genuine feelings complicate the contract.

Released in 2006, Failure to Launch is a comedy and romance film. Inside comedy it is classed as Romcom.

7,846 other films from the 2000s form the cohort it is ranked inside. The calibrated figure is built from 206 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 212 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 10,368 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Failure to Launch lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2000s (7,847 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 206.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376