Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Butterfly (2004) poster
2004
global pct
55.8

Film · 2004 · Films · 2000s

Butterfly

Two parallel scores from 7 z-qualifying reviewers and 7 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

55.8%
Z · Global
61.3%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2000s
80.1%
Raw · Global
85.6%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2000s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 24-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
55.8
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2000s
61.3
Raw average · global
80.1
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2000s
85.6

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 24-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 7,847 peers in Films · 2000s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.069
DB1 raw-mean rating7.86 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.86 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.552
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)7 / 7

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

7 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.069. DB2 raw mean = 7.86.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.552. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 55.8 / cohort 61.3. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376