Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Because of Winn-Dixie (2005) poster
2005
global pct
44.3

Film · 2005 · Films · 2000s

Because of Winn-Dixie

Two parallel scores from 59 z-qualifying reviewers and 63 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

44.3%
Z · Global
49.1%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2000s
61.3%
Raw · Global
65.7%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2000s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 17-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
44.3
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2000s
49.1
Raw average · global
61.3
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2000s
65.7

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 17-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 7,847 peers in Films · 2000s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.065
DB1 raw-mean rating7.00 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.11 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.280
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)59 / 63

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

59 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.065. DB2 raw mean = 7.11.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.280. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 44.3 / cohort 49.1. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376