RankquantRQ
Beautiful Creatures (2013) poster
2013
global pct
27.2

Film · 2013 · Films · 2010s

Beautiful Creatures

Scored from 191 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

27.2%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
32.8%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
10.4%
AI-adjusted percentile
191 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

In a small South Carolina town, teenager Ethan Wate is drawn to mysterious newcomer Lena Duchannes, who comes from a family of supernatural beings called Casters. As her sixteenth birthday approaches, Lena faces a dark family curse that will claim her for either the light or the dark, threatening her bond with Ethan and the town around them.

Beautiful Creatures (2013) is a film IMDb files under the drama, fantasy and romance genres.

Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 1,651 of whom clear the calibration test. The calibrated figure is built from 191 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 203 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. The cohort it is ranked inside is 2010s films — 13,059 of them.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Beautiful Creatures lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 191.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376