Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Bad Blood (2017) poster
2017
global pct
58.2

TV Series · 2017 · TV Series · 2010s

Bad Blood

Two parallel scores from 129 z-qualifying reviewers and 140 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: TV Series · 2010s (3,236 peers).

58.2%
Z · Global
47.4%
Z · Cohort
TV Series · 2010s
38.1%
Raw · Global
30.6%
Raw · Cohort
TV Series · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↑ critic-elevated · 20-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
58.2
Z-normalized · cohortTV Series · 2010s
47.4
Raw average · global
38.1
Raw average · cohortTV Series · 2010s
30.6

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 20-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — discriminating reviewers liked it more than the casual crowd.

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 3,236 peers in TV Series · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.097
DB1 raw-mean rating6.25 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating6.25 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.048
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)129 / 140

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

129 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.097. DB2 raw mean = 6.25.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.048. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 58.2 / cohort 47.4. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: TV Series · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376