RankquantRQ
ATM (2012) poster
2012
global pct
9.4

Film · 2012 · Films · 2010s

ATM

Scored from 190 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

9.4%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
12.0%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
1.4%
AI-adjusted percentile
190 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

Three coworkers stop at an isolated ATM kiosk late at night after an office holiday party. Trapped inside the glass vestibule, they find themselves stalked by a silent hooded figure waiting in the empty parking lot, with no way to call for help and no clear motive for the attacker.

ATM (2012) is a film IMDb files under the horror, mystery and thriller genres.

190 IMDb reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, and those are the ones the calibrated score reads; a separate, broader pool of 191 reviewers with at least two reviews each feeds the raw-average track. A second review pool sits behind it as well: 523 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately. The cohort it is ranked inside is 2010s films — 13,059 of them.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where ATM lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 190.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376