Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
Alms for a Blind Horse (2011) poster
2011
global pct
63.5

Film · 2011 · Films · 2010s

Alms for a Blind Horse

Two parallel scores from 9 z-qualifying reviewers and 14 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

63.5%
Z · Global
70.4%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
95.9%
Raw · Global
98.1%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 32-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
63.5
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
70.4
Raw average · global
95.9
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
98.1

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 32-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.159
DB1 raw-mean rating8.89 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating8.93 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.389
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)9 / 14

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

9 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.159. DB2 raw mean = 8.93.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.389. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 63.5 / cohort 70.4. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376