Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
A Midsummer Night's Dream (1999) poster
1999
global pct
45.2

Film · 1999 · Films · 1990s

A Midsummer Night's Dream

Two parallel scores from 138 z-qualifying reviewers and 144 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 1990s (4,082 peers).

45.2%
Z · Global
43.0%
Z · Cohort
Films · 1990s
60.2%
Raw · Global
54.9%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 1990s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 15-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
45.2
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 1990s
43.0
Raw average · global
60.2
Raw average · cohortFilms · 1990s
54.9

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 15-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 4,082 peers in Films · 1990s

Mean reviewer z-score-0.054
DB1 raw-mean rating6.96 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating7.07 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.194
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)138 / 144

Summary

In 19th-century Tuscany, two pairs of mismatched young lovers flee into an enchanted forest, where a meddlesome fairy king and his sprite Puck use a love-inducing flower that scrambles their affections. Nearby, a troupe of bumbling amateur actors rehearses a play, and their weaver Bottom is transformed and drawn into the jealous quarrel between the fairy king and queen. Adapted from Shakespeare's comedy.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

138 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = -0.054. DB2 raw mean = 7.07.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.194. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 45.2 / cohort 43. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 1990s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376