Rankquant
MethodologyAbout⌕ Search
50 to 1 (2014) poster
2014
global pct
62.4

Film · 2014 · Films · 2010s

50 to 1

Two parallel scores from 20 z-qualifying reviewers and 32 raw-average reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

62.4%
Z · Global
69.1%
Z · Cohort
Films · 2010s
92.5%
Raw · Global
96.0%
Raw · Cohort
Films · 2010s
Two scores · one item
↓ crowd-elevated · 30-pt gap
Z-normalized · global
62.4
Z-normalized · cohortFilms · 2010s
69.1
Raw average · global
92.5
Raw average · cohortFilms · 2010s
96.0

Z-normalized corrects for reviewer bias (every reviewer re-centered onto their personal scale). Raw average uses simple mean across the broader pool including stddev=0 reviewers. The 30-point gap is the rating-inflation signature for this title — the casual crowd liked it more than discriminating reviewers (a classic inflation pattern).

Where this title sits

0255075100

Z-normalized percentile · 13,059 peers in Films · 2010s

Mean reviewer z-score+0.145
DB1 raw-mean rating7.70 /10
DB2 raw-mean rating8.56 /10
90% CI-floor (z)-0.223
Reviewers (DB1 / DB2)20 / 32

Summary

Plot summary pending — enrichment is running across all 52,376 titles in the catalog.

Pipeline applied to this title

The math, in this order

01
Z-score per reviewer

20 stddev>0 reviewers re-centered onto personal z-scale.

02
Aggregate

Mean z = +0.145. DB2 raw mean = 8.56.

03
CI-floor

90% CI-floor = -0.223. Thin samples penalized.

04
ECDF percentile

Global 62.4 / cohort 69.1. Z-track and raw-track ranked separately.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376