RankquantRQ
Tower (2016) poster
2016
global pct
99.7

Film · 2016 · Films · 2010s

Tower

Scored from 33 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

99.7%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
99.8%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
98.4%
AI-adjusted percentile
33 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

On 1 August 1966 a sniper on the observation deck of the University of Texas clock tower opened fire on the campus below, pinning students and passers-by in the open for roughly ninety minutes. Keith Maitland's documentary reconstructs that hour and a half from the vantage of the people caught in it: a pregnant student, Claire Wilson, left lying wounded on the pavement, an injured newspaper delivery boy, a radio reporter broadcasting live, and the officers who eventually climbed the tower. Actors perform the participants' recorded testimony in rotoscoped animation, cut together with archival news footage and present-day interviews with the survivors themselves. The gunman is kept at the margins; the film stays on the ground.

Released in 2016, Tower is an animation, crime and documentary film. Its certificate is Not Rated. Its country of origin is listed as the United States. It runs 1h 22m.

Only 33 of its IMDb reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 33 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 52 of whom clear the calibration test. 13,058 other films from the 2010s form the cohort it is ranked inside.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Tower lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 33.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376