RankquantRQ
The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017) poster
2017
global pct
19.9

Film · 2017 · Films · 2010s

The Killing of a Sacred Deer

Scored from 939 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

19.9%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
24.5%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
3.5%
AI-adjusted percentile
939 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A successful cardiothoracic surgeon forms an uneasy bond with a teenage boy whose father died on his operating table. When the surgeon's family is struck by a mysterious illness, he is forced to confront an impossible moral choice rooted in the boy's chilling demand for balance.

The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017) is a film IMDb files under the drama, horror and mystery genres.

Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 573 of whom clear the calibration test. The calibrated figure is built from 939 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 1,007 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. 13,058 other films from the 2010s form the cohort it is ranked inside.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where The Killing of a Sacred Deer lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2010s (13,059 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 939.

Cohort: Films · 2010s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376