Is Storks actually good?

Storks sits in the 66.1% percentile against all 52,376 ranked films, meaning it scores above 66.1% of them.

How does Storks compare to similar films?

Within Films · 2010s, Storks lands in the 72.8% percentile. The cohort comparison exists because a global rank flatters or punishes a film for its category rather than its quality.

How many reviewers is Storks's score based on?

126 calibrated reviewers stand behind Storks's score.

2016

global pct

66.1

Film · 2016 · Films · 2010s

Storks

Name: Storks
Genre: Adventure, Animation, Comedy
Released: 2016

Scored from 126 calibrated IMDb reviewers. Cohort: Films · 2010s (13,059 peers).

66.1%

Global percentile

vs. all 52,376 ranked titles

72.8%

In-cohort percentile

Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles

84.6%

AI-adjusted percentile

126 calibrated reviewers

Summary

Storks have moved on from delivering babies to shipping packages for a giant internet retailer. When top stork Junior accidentally activates the long-dormant baby-making machine and produces an unauthorized infant girl, he and an orphan human named Tulip must secretly deliver the baby to her family before the boss finds out.

Released in 2016, Storks is an adventure, animation and comedy film.

126 IMDb reviewers are calibrated for this title, and those are the ones the calibrated score reads; a separate, broader pool of 127 reviewers with at least two reviews each feeds the raw-average track. Its in-cohort standing is measured against the other 13,058 2010s films, not against the whole corpus. A second review pool sits behind it as well: 504 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately.

Is Storks (2016) worth watching?

Cohort: Films · 2010s · 13,059 titles
Calibrated reviewers: 126
Method: How percentiles are computed

Cohort: Films · 2010s

What else scores like Storks?