RankquantRQ
March of the Penguins (2005) poster
2005
global pct
84.8

Film · 2005 · Films · 2000s

March of the Penguins

Scored from 264 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 2000s (7,847 peers).

84.8%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
89.5%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 2000s · 7,847 titles
97.7%
AI-adjusted percentile
264 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

This nature documentary follows the annual journey of emperor penguins in Antarctica as they trek miles inland to their traditional breeding grounds. Braving brutal cold and predators, mating pairs take turns guarding their single egg and traveling back to the sea for food, all to ensure the survival of the next generation.

March of the Penguins is a 2005 documentary and family film.

The calibrated figure is built from 264 reviewers whose rating history varies enough to place their own average. A broader pool of 274 reviewers with two or more reviews feeds the raw-average track instead. The cohort it is ranked inside is 2000s films — 7,847 of them. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 3,991 of whom clear the calibration test.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where March of the Penguins lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 2000s (7,847 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 264.

Cohort: Films · 2000s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376