RankquantRQ
High Art (1998) poster
1998
global pct
64.3

Film · 1998 · Films · 1990s

High Art

Scored from 55 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 1990s (4,082 peers).

64.3%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
63.7%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 1990s · 4,082 titles
76.7%
AI-adjusted percentile
55 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A magazine editor becomes romantically involved with a reclusive and troubled photographer, drawn into a world of drugs and artistic obsession.

High Art (1998) is a film IMDb files under the drama and romance genres. It runs 1h 32m and carries an NC-17 certificate. It was made in the United States.

A second review pool sits behind it as well: 282 Rotten Tomatoes reviewers clear the same calibration test, and Rankquant scores them separately. Only 55 of its IMDb reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 58 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track. Its in-cohort standing is measured against the other 4,081 1990s films, not against the whole corpus.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where High Art lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 1990s (4,082 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 55.

Cohort: Films · 1990s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376