RankquantRQ
Cactus Flower (1969) poster
1969
global pct
78.4

Film · 1969 · Films · 1960s

Cactus Flower

Scored from 79 calibrated IMDb reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the title is ranked. Cohort: Films · 1960s (1,929 peers).

78.4%
Global percentile
vs. all 52,376 ranked titles
71.4%
In-cohort percentile
Films · 1960s · 1,929 titles
91.6%
AI-adjusted percentile
79 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Summary

A dentist's young receptionist lies about being married to avoid entanglement with her boss. When she needs a fake husband, complications arise with an older dentist colleague who sees through her charade.

Cactus Flower (1969) is a film IMDb files under the comedy and romance genres. It runs 1h 43m. Its country of origin is listed as the United States.

Only 79 of its IMDb reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, so the calibrated figure rests on a thin sample; a broader pool of 79 reviewers with at least two reviews feeds the raw-average track. Rotten Tomatoes carries a separate audience for the same title, 172 of whom clear the calibration test. The cohort it is ranked inside is 1960s films — 1,929 of them.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this title against every other title those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — a 7/10 from a hard grader sits well above their average, while a 7/10 from a generous grader sits below theirs. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a raw average.

Global percentile
Where Cactus Flower lands against every title we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — titles of the same format released in the same decade. A 1970s film is judged against 1970s films, not against last year's streaming series. Ranked against Films · 1960s (1,929 titles).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each title keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 79.

Cohort: Films · 1960s

Closest peers in the same cohort

See all 52,376