RankquantRQ
Pisano Cisplatino Tannat

Red · Progreso · Uruguay

Pisano Cisplatino Tannat

Scored from 448 calibrated Vivino reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the bottle is ranked. Cohort: Red · Uruguay (12 wines).

Grape · Tannat
26.5%
Global percentile
vs. all 69,234 ranked wines
27.3%
In-cohort percentile
Red · Uruguay · 12 wines
14.6%
AI-adjusted percentile
448 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Find this wine: view on Vivino · compare prices on Wine-Searcher

What reviewers say

No daba un duro por el. 2011... Corcho sintético... Al principio casi se va por la fregadera, pero... A las horas de abierto remontó cual Liverpool en Anfield. Rico coupage de tannat y merlot con crianza de 8 meses en barricas de roble francés.

From a top-rated Vivino review for this bottle.

Summary

From Progreso in Uruguay, Pisano Cisplatino Tannat is a red.

448 Vivino reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, and those are the ones the calibrated score reads; a separate, broader pool of 459 reviewers with at least two ratings each feeds the raw-average track. The cohort it is ranked inside holds 12 Uruguayan reds.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this bottle against every other wine those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — four stars from someone who hands out fives means something very different from four stars from someone who rarely goes above three. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a star average.

Global percentile
Where Pisano Cisplatino Tannat lands against every wine we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — wines of the same type from the same country. A Chilean red is judged against Chilean reds, not against Champagne. Ranked against Red · Uruguay (12 wines).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each wine keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 448.