RankquantRQ
Kara Tara Chardonnay

White · 西ケープ州 · 南アフリカ

Kara Tara Chardonnay

Scored from 161 calibrated Vivino reviewers, each re-centered on their own rating baseline before the bottle is ranked. Cohort: White · 南アフリカ (7 wines).

Grape · Chardonnay
58.3%
Global percentile
vs. all 69,234 ranked wines
16.7%
In-cohort percentile
White · 南アフリカ · 7 wines
57.1%
AI-adjusted percentile
161 calibrated reviewers, thin samples pulled to the mean

Find this wine: view on Vivino · compare prices on Wine-Searcher

What reviewers say

Love StarkeConde’s initiative with this series of wines. Beautifully concentrated Chardy, older vines&care resulted in fine varietal expression. Scents of orange preserve,wet stone minerality &lemon meringue.

From a top-rated Vivino review for this bottle.

Summary

From 西ケープ州 in South Africa, Kara Tara Chardonnay is a white.

161 Vivino reviewers rate with enough spread for a personal baseline to be measured, and those are the ones the calibrated score reads; a separate, broader pool of 161 reviewers with at least two ratings each feeds the raw-average track. Its in-cohort standing is measured against 6 other whites from South Africa, not against the corpus as a whole.

How the score was built

We compare the reviewers of this bottle against every other wine those same people reviewed. Each review is scored relative to the reviewer's own baseline — four stars from someone who hands out fives means something very different from four stars from someone who rarely goes above three. Every reviewer then counts the same, so the result is a calibrated consensus rather than a star average.

Global percentile
Where Kara Tara Chardonnay lands against every wine we rank.
In-cohort percentile
The same comparison narrowed to its cohort — wines of the same type from the same country. A Chilean red is judged against Chilean reds, not against Champagne. Ranked against White · 南アフリカ (7 wines).
AI-adjusted percentile
The same reviewer-normalized score, corrected for how much confidence the sample supports: thin samples are pulled toward the corpus average. Each wine keeps the share n / (n + 53) of its measured distance from the average, where n is its calibrated-reviewer count, and the result is ranked on the same scale as the global percentile.53 is the median sample size across everything we rank. Here n is 161.